Watch

How machines measure what you feel.

Andrei Potanin, Chief Scientist at Perception Instruments LLC, explains how emulative instruments and tribology -- the science of friction -- are transforming how personal care companies test their products, replacing expensive expert panels and home-use tests with fast, reliable measurements that mimic real human actions.

Andrei Potanin, Chief Scientist at Perception Instruments, presenting 'How Machines Measure What You Feel'

Andrei Potanin, Chief Scientist · 5:25 · August 15, 2026 · Watch on YouTube

Chapters

  1. 0:00 Introduction
  2. 0:21 Human Testing Methods
  3. 1:17 Material Property Measurements
  4. 2:27 Emulative Measurements
  5. 3:38 Tribology & Friction
  6. 5:01 Visit Us

Transcript

Andrei Potanin: Hello, my name is Andrei Potanin. I am a chief scientist of a startup called Perception Instruments LLC. We developed this company in order to create instruments which can predict human perception of personal care products, such as toothpaste, skincare products, and things like that.

There are two types of instruments to do that. One instrument is a human itself, himself or herself, and usually this is the most reliable way of predicting human perception. Many companies rely on this. That can be expert panels, which are a number of humans get together, they are specifically trained to judge, for instance, stickiness or spreadability of a product, and they judge it on a scale of zero to ten, and those human panels are a very reliable test.

It also can be done by actual customers at home. This is your so-called home use test. Both are quite expensive and time-consuming, and therefore product developers always prefer instrumental measurements if they can have one. There are two types which they can potentially use.

The first is focused on material properties. They are measuring material properties such as viscosity, for instance. As a scientist, I prefer this approach because this is what you are taught how to measure at school. The problem with this is it doesn't quite account for the human mind, which can be sometimes very messy and mess different things together.

For instance, if you take that same viscosity, a human can test it by putting a finger into the cup with the liquid and see how hard it is to move, and from that conclude that this is more viscous than that. But it also can be done differently -- by pouring a liquid into a cup and looking at how it flows.

It turns out that in this case, perception of viscosity will be affected not only by viscosity as such, but also by the way it looks, its color, its transparency. There are multiple papers on this peculiar element of human perception, specifically about viscosity. But this is the same thing about other things too, not only viscosity.

That's why people developed what is called emulative measurements, which are emulating the actual human action. The most commonly used and popular workhorse in the industry is the texture analyzer, which is simply a very simple instrument going up and down with different attachments and measuring how it penetrates into something or how it separates from something.

The problem is that it's one-dimensional, and the second problem, it lacks a visual component -- it doesn't record the visual element of what is happening. That is why we created a number of emulative instruments and sold them, for instance, to Colgate, which were dealing with toothpaste in this case, because we were measuring stringiness of a toothpaste, how stringy it is when discharged.

It's an important property because it determines how messy it is. Or shape retention, because the paste should hold its shape on the brush. You can predict both from material properties -- there are ways to do that, they're quite complicated -- but this is much simpler, faster, and easier, and reliable because it's exactly what humans do.

Now we are moving to the next step that is called tribology. Tribology is the science of friction. There are tribometers; there are not a lot of them available commercially. But the problem is that they were not created for human action -- they don't account for the way humans do that. For instance, they were developed for testing lubricants in machinery, and not what a human would feel.

Therefore, their movement is very limited. Whereas, for instance, if you do it on skin -- talking about moisturizer or sunscreen -- humans would spread it on their skin, trying to push it into their skin, which is the purpose of all this. The tribometer cannot do that.

But we still can emulate this action and measure the coefficient of friction. The coefficient of friction has turned out to be very important because it predicts how well the product forms a protective film on the skin, and therefore it predicts not only how much a human likes it, but also how efficient it is in terms of health, because it prevents skin cancer after all. That's what this product is for in the first place.

So we have this on our webpage called perceptioninstruments.com. You are welcome to visit it and see how it works. And moreover, we can talk, and -- as opposed to most competitors -- we can actually modify our instruments to your specific needs and to your specific products.

So I hope to see you soon visiting our webpage. Thank you very much.

Request a custom instrument for your product →